The UM schizophrenic inconsistency

Since delusions are firmly held beliefs not supported by objective facts, aren’t Unificationists indeed experiencing a sort of religious schizophrenia which leads them to lose touch with reality?

Unificationists are ceaselessly preaching about an imminent otherworldly ideal which neither exist within the "perfect True Moon Family"nor within their "victorious" Unification Movement at large. Therefore they have for decades remained stuck in an all different kind of reality without anymore being able to recognize and label such an everyday life as inconsistent.

So UM members tirelessly keep advocating co-prosperity, co-governance and co-vision, like a mantra. And without the shade of a doubt these words represent quite an appealing and desirable program for humankind.

I guess a vast number of organizations, of economists, of politicians and religious leaders are already working on such programs with great enthusiasm to progressively make this desirable dream become a reality.

Can we however  objectively observe any concrete step toward examplifying these objectives within the Unification movement?  Isn't rather the UM the shameful embodiement of the perfect opposite of such a beautiful ideal?

My unstoppable curiosity and genuine search for truth are then leading me to formulate the following politically incorrect and worrisome questions:

-Doesn't co-prosperity refer to an economic system in which businesses do pay their share of taxes without resorting to hide benefits in tax havens, where workers are fairly paid and where all generated benefits are possibly shared between all the employees? Has then Unificationism ever set up such a business upholding strict financial transparency and genuine care for its workers which could be a model to be followed?

-Doesn't co-governance refer to an exemplary democracy where real separation of powers does exist and people do govern through their trusted representatives which they can freely elect, hold accountable and possibly revoke?  How then can the Unificationist Movement with its specific history of unshared governance based on absolute theocratic monarchy genuinely plead for such highly desirable cause?

-Doesn't co-vision refer to a crystal clear universal and workable vision? The greatest ever and long awaited unanimously satisfying constitution which could lovingly gather all the infighting human family?

Here again, how can today the intellectually split, emotionally unsettled and economically fighting Unificationist movement successfully promote such an all-encompassing vision? Isn't the mere fact that three quarelling Unificationist groups are presently suing one another the obvious proff that this "co-vision" doesn't exist yet or is blatantly unapplied and/or is unconvincing within its own ranks?

It is pointless to mention problems of translation to explain this reality. The problem is much deeper.

In my book, the problem of Unificationism does not reside in its untranslatable Korean words but in the absence of clear-cut example-setting which derives from its inherent schizophrenic inconsistency.

It’s clearly more a matter of consistency and self delusion than a matter of translation.

We are still far from the day when all humans will at last be able to joyfully acknowledge that “the Word has become flesh”!